Management Priorities

About  Contacts  Shop  Links  Privacy

Home
Up

Lake Burley Griffin Willow Management Plan
On this page:

Back ] Up ] Next ]


Willow Management Priorities

Willow Control Priorities

The prioritisation of willow control is based primarily on the threat to the wider environment, and the cost effectiveness of control. The decision and method of controlling any particular willow will depend on site specifics and should adhere to the guiding principles outlined in the Plan. The following six priorities apply to the entire survey area, and are consistent with the principles outlined in the Upper Murrumbidgee Willow Management Strategy. The following recommendations should be used in conjunction with the associated maps. An interactive series of GIS layers is available as part of the Plan.

Priority 1: High priority species for control

The highest priority for control is the Black Willow, Purple Osier and Tortured Willow.

Tortured willow

Other willow seedlings including the Basket Willow and Golden Upright Willow need to be controlled as a very high priority also, but occur in larger numbers and thus are of lower priority than the three species mentioned above.

All these species should be controlled using a range of control methods appropriate to the specific site. These species are currently low in numbers and tend to be smaller and more manageable than other larger infestations. This reduces the risk of unwanted impacts on banks, aesthetics and recreation.

Purple osier

The seeding willow infestations tend to be increasing in density and size. In this regard, it is important that they are eliminated as soon as possible in order to minimise future control costs. Seeding willows are somewhat limited in that there appears to be only a small number of sites that are suitable to support major seeding events. This will assist in their control and follow up management.

Recommendation 4:   Willow seedlings need to be eliminated as the highest priority.

An innovative approach to minimizing the impact of seeding willows on the environment would be to time water releases from Scrivener Dam so they don’t coincide with seeding events (which usually occur around spring). Willow seed is only viable for a short length of time and trapping seed within the Lake would go a long way to reducing downstream impacts in the Lower Molonglo and Murrumbidgee Rivers.

Recommendation 5: Consideration should be given to timing water releases from Scrivener Dam to minimise the spread of willow seeds downstream.

Map 1 shows the location of isolated seeding willow species in yellow, purple and green.

Priority 2: Control unidentified hybrids

Unidentified hybrids should also be controlled as a high priority since they are few in number and pose a high risk of producing viable seed.

Recommendation 6:   Unidentified hybrids need to be controlled as a high priority.

Map 1 shows the location of unidentified hybrids in red.

Priority 3: Strategic control of the Golden Upright Willow

Strategic control of the Golden Upright Willow is important as these are seeding willows and they are in large numbers around the Lake. They also tend to be in high profile areas such as around the Carillon. While these willows should be removed wherever feasible this could create problems for recreation, visual amenity and other Lake uses. Therefore control should focus on removal of females and retention of males only as the first stage of a control program. In the longer term, for example ten years or more, it might be possible to remove all of these willows.

Golden Upright Willows (left of photo) need to be managed as a high priority, wheras Weeping Willows (right of photo) could be retained to maintain visual amenity
Golden Upright Willows (left of photo) need to be managed as a high priority, whereas Weeping Willows (right of photo) could be retained to maintain visual amenity

 

Recommendation 7:   Golden Upright Willows need to be managed as a high priority. Where possible they should be eliminated. Where this isn’t possible (in the short term, for example the next five years) only males should be retained.

Map 1 shows location of Golden Upright Willows in orange.

Map 9 shows the most common sex of the dominant species. Used in conjunction with Maps 2 and 5, the location of female Golden Upright Willows can be pinpointed as targets for control.

Priority 4: Strategic control of Basket Willow

Basket willow wasn’t present in very large numbers except for the lower reaches of the Molonglo River; however, it was found in higher numbers than the other seeding willows. It was found in isolated patches around the Lake and the Upper Molonglo but not as the dominant species (which tended to be Crack Willow). Basket willow presents a particular problem as it spreads both by seed and vegetatively. In addition to this, pollination events are timed more closely with the Weeping Willow than with other willow species, and the majority of Basket Willows were found to be male. This poses a particular threat as the Weeping Willow are all female.

Basket willow should be removed where possible although this may be difficult along the Molonglo River where it is growing among dense infestations of Crack Willow. This could pose operational difficulties, and may be an expensive proposition. When removing Basket Willow in sites heavily colonised with Crack Willow there is a high likelihood of Crack Willow reinvading the site.

Specimens of Basket Willow would need to be identified and marked during their flowering periods as the timing of their flowering differs from the flowering period of the Crack Willow. This would need to occur prior to a control program.

Recommendation 8:   Basket Willow should be removed as a medium to high priority around the Lake area. Along the Molonglo River, Basket Willow should be identified and an assessment made as to the practicalities and economic feasibility of selective removal among Crack Willow.

Maps 5, 6 and 7 show the location of Basket Willow as the second dominant species (i.e. less than half of the total distribution of other willows on site). It was not found to be the dominant species in any of the survey area. On Map 7, whilst identified as being the second dominant species, Basket Willow made up less than 5% of the total willow population. In other areas they made up just under 50% of the willows present.

Priority 5: Strategic control of Crack Willow

While Crack Willow were identified as one of the major problematic willow species, the infestation tends to be extremely dense and will be very costly to control. Any attempt made to control Crack Willow would need to have defined goals. This is due to the high source of willows coming from upstream.

A strategic program to control Crack Willows in the shorter term should relate to specific goals as follows:

  • Control of source trees such as those in the upper reaches of the Molonglo River – starting upstream and working downstream.
  • Specific asset protection such as boat ramps and other infrastructure
  • Areas where access to the Lake needs to be maintained
  • Areas where public safety is at risk
  • Water-ski area maintenance (specifically discussed in the section addressing Areas of Special Consideration)
Crack Willows are present in very high numbers around the Lake and along the Molonglo River

 

Recommendation 9:   Any attempt to control Crack Willow should have defined and specific goals.

Another more innovative approach to minimize the spread of Crack Willows is to reduce their contact with water by trimming in areas where they are creating a problem or potential problem. This is undertaken routinely along the water-ski area for public safety reasons and reduces the incidence of willow limbs resprouting in the water.

Maps 2, 3 and 4 show the distribution of Crack Willows as the dominant species (i.e. they make up more than half the willows on site).

Priority 6: Other willows

Weeping Willows and Golden Weeping Willows pose very little threat to the natural environment and should be left for visual amenity, shade and heritage value. If certain trees are posing a problem in any given location, they should be assessed on an individual basis, as would be the case with any vegetation type around the Lake. Only female Weeping Willows were introduced into Australia and have different flowering times to other willows preventing their spread by seed. However, it has been noted in some catchments that flowering times of Weeping Willows and problem willow species have aligned to produce Weeping Willow hybrids. The potential for this around the Lake should be recognized and monitored. Surveys revealed no evidence of this as yet.

Weeping willows also provide habitat for Darter and Cormorant breeding events in certain areas (discussed further in the section addressing bird breeding events) and roosting sites for the Nankeen Night Heron along with other bird species.

Recommendation 10:   Weeping Willows and Golden Weeping Willows should be retained unless posing a specific hazard to public safety.
Recommendation 11:   The potential for Weeping Willows to hybridise with some male problem willows as seen in some NSW catchments should be recognised and monitored periodically.

Maps 1 and 8 show the distribution of Weeping Willows.

Weeping willows are aesthetically pleasing and play a significant role in maintaining heritage values of the Lake Burley Griffin area

Back ] Next ]

About the Molonglo Catchment Group    Contacts    Links    Privacy
Send mail to webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2004-20010 Molonglo Catchment Group Inc.
Last modified: 23/07/2010